You can also title this journal "Top 10 reasons C-Puff likes older movies more". I don't know if there actually ARE 10 things specifically. I'm just gonna list these as they come to me.
10: Practical Effects. Don't get me wrong, CG has it's place, but it's been abused beyond all reason inmovies today. To me, the perfect blend of CG and practical effects is Jurassic Park. Ever since then CG has become rediculously over-used. Anyway not much else to say. Every movie reviewer on the internet has pretty much bitched about CG. But frankly, I'd much rather watch crappy Practical effects than Crappy CG.
9: Film Grain. I love Film Grain. I WANT Film Grain! Even on my Blu-Rays I still want my film Grain! This is why I play Mass Effect with Film Grain turned ON. I don't mean I want so much film-grain that every movie looks like it was shot on Shiteo. But things like Jaws have JUST the right amount of film grain, where the image is crisp, but there's still an Organic feeling to the movie. Modern movies are so sterile looking these days. It's very sad.
8: Ma. Or at least that's what Miyazaki called it. The name of the silence inbetween clapping hands (how Zen). Granted not all older movies have this, but it's something that's more or less completely absent from modern movies. It's a little hard to explain though because modern movies don't always "Let the music tell the audience how to feel" (although a LOT of them DO do that) but it's not just that. Watch Jaws or Close Encounters or 2010: The Year we make Contact and you'll see what I mean. There are loooong stretches of not exactly silence, but periods where you don't really NEED to hear what's being said because that's not the point of a scene.
Ugh. Just... watch the scene in Jaws where Brody is on the beach with his wife and afraid there might be a shark attack (I believe it's the scene where the little boy gets killed)
Or watch the supper scene from Close Encounters where Roy starts playing with his mashed potatoes.
Or.. ..pretty much ANY scene in 2010.
Like I said it's hard to explain, but if you know what I mean then you know.
7: Hand painted posters. Oh Drew Struzan... how do I love thee? If you don't know Drew Stuzan is, first of all; Shame on you. and second, google him IMMEDIETLY. He is probably one of the most influential Poster painters. These days it's all just photoshoping a bunch of actor's heads together or throwing a ton of gritty textures on a city/jungle/guy's face etc. Please can't we go back to real artists instead of post-grab graphic designers? (ok, to be fair we ARE getting painted posters now and then (see Hellboy) but not NEARLY enough. No. Instead we get THIS.
[link] 
6: People Smoking. I don't smoke myself. In fact I can't stand it. but in a movie a cigarette has a certain symbolism to it that can't really be replaced by anything else. There's no real better symbol to communicate what a character is thinking in that specific situation. Depression, solitude, thoughtfulness, rebellion, relaxation, after-glow, seduction. Smoking is bad. Yes it is. But in a movie a cigarette is a symbol, and one I miss seeing.
Ugh... ok I can't think of any more although there are definitely more, but due to my lack of knowledge concerning EXACT techincalities as far as lighting, colour correction and things of the like go I can't really complain too much because I'm not too sure how to complain about it. With that said however I DON'T like the way lightning and Colour correction is done in modern movies. I don't know what's being done different but I don't like it.
Go watch
2010
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
Jaws
Alien and Aliens
The Terminator
Robocop
etc. Pretty much anything made before 1995.
It's late. I'm going to bed.
#10; ABSOLUTELY!!! It's like the overuse of CG sucks some of the wonder out of film.
"How did they do that?
"CG, computers."
"Oh.
#9; I miss the scratching of records.
#8; I love outdoors films that manage to really get the silence across. I also think that the perfect way to mark a moment of drama is silence... like telling Bambi his mom's dead *silence*
#7; Modern movie posters are getting kind of generic. The only one I really liked recently was for The Thing (It's not human... yet)
#6; Smoking... I guess. I like when the cigarettes or cigars are used as part of the character or scene (smoke filled room; DRAMA!) but I've seen cigarettes and cigars used in distracting ways too.
#5; Hmmm... Something Captain America caught perfectly; old fashioned sense of appearance standards. All the women with their hair perfectly coiffed, noses freshly powdered, blouses and skirts neat and straight. Men's hair precisely parted, shoes polished, clothes pressed. When the actress with the messy curls and loose clothes stepped into his hospital room I almost choked on my tongue.
#4; DANCING!!! Okay, I know there are a few dance movies out there, but Frank Sinatra! Ginger! The ol' soft shoe! Dancing on the walls and ceiling of a room!
#3; Epics. Those old, really, really long stories that just HAD to be told in more than two hours. Titanic seems to be to be the last of a dead species. Can you imagine sitting in theaters for Gone With the Wind or Patton ?
#2; Fainting. Not comedic fainting, but shocked fainting. I've seen more people faint in real life than I have in any serious film made since I was born. Half-point given to Pirates of the Carribean.
#1; Movies that don't give lip service to Political Correctness. I know, they all did to whatever was Politically Correct in their day, but it's a relief seeing something made before the current social requirements. For example; a single, masculinely strong female character demanding awe from all around her for her amazing mad skillz...who happens to be incredibly attractive.
Film Grain is nice, though sometimes I do love digital remasterings of some films. I also miss smoking in films, I'm an asthmatic but I agree with your points on the qualities of the characters and their cigarette.
Hmm, well at least I don't miss the old-style posters. In fact, I don't think I've ever given posters great amount of thought, they aren't very important to me.
So yeah, I like the idea of practical effects but I don't prefer crappy practical effects/models over CG effects/rendered models, unless they're bad, I hate badly rendered CG effects/cheap models in movies.
I still prefer the model effects in series 1-6 of Red Dwarf as opposed to the new CGI they used. It just looks more solid.
Never saw Red Dwarf myself, but I know what you mean. There's a very bad 80s movie called "The Last Starfighter". The movie is bad but if it had practical effects instead of the bad 80s CG I might actually like it XD Hey, it worked for Howard the Duck! *Loves that movie*